Abstract
The transformation of the concept-form relationship into a concrete expression in the design experience, which is considered a challenging process, is one of the essential parts of this process. In this process, in which various methods are evaluated, the form seen as a communication tool occurs through distinct connotations. Within the scope of this study, students' search for form in a landscape design project problem, their connotations in the education process, and thus their solutions to the design problem were evaluated.
In the study, the studies of the students made during a semester were criticized in the presence of the coordinator. The concept of coffee and its associations in the landscape design of the 3rd Generation coffee sales unit in a campus venue, the sources they inspired and their final projects constitute the material of this study. The concept-form relationships of the projects were examined and, as a result, it was determined that it was easier for students to transfer certain formal objects to the projects in the search for form.
References
Ackoff, R. L. (2010). Systems Thinking for Curious Managers. Triarchy Press. Available at: https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=rLZJEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=1.%09Ackoff,+R.+L.+(2010).+Systems+Thinking+for+Curious+Managers.+Triarchy+Press.&ots=Hsjo9djLxk&sig=yr4fQ8jjKfttnor55qqPKDLbzCE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=1.%09Ackoff%2C%20R.%20L.%20(2010).%20Systems%20Thinking%20for%20Curious%20Managers.%20Triarchy%20Press.&f=false
Alpak, E. M., Özkan, D. G., & Düzenli, T. (2018). Systems Approach İn Landscape Design: A Studio Work. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9402-7
Leblebici-Başar, D., & Altarriba, J. (2013). The Role of İmagery and Emotion İn The Translation of Concepts İnto Product Form. The Design Journal, 16(3), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630613X13660502571787
Bayramoğlu, E., Büyükkurt, U., & Yurdakul, N. M. (2019). Peyzaj Mimarlığı Eğitiminde Proje Tasarım Süreci: Trabzon “Karagöz Meydanı” Çevre Tasarım Projeleri. Social Sciences, 14(1), 15-24. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/nwsasocial/issue/42905/427106
Bonnardel, N. (2000). Towards Understanding and Supporting Creativity İn Design: Analogies In A Constrained Cognitive Environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 13(7-8), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00067-8
Casakin, H., & Goldschmidt, G. (1999). Expertise and The Use of Visual Analogy: İmplications for Design Education. Design Studies, 20(2), 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00032-5
Creswell, J. P., & Clark, V. L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Vol. 3d. https://sci-hub.hkvisa.net/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x
Dorst, K. (2006). Design Problems and Design Paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4-17. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25224059
Düzenli, T., & Alpak, E. M. (2020). Peyzaj Mimarlığı Çevre Tasarım. Sanat Eğitimi Dergisi, 1, 31–42. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=921781
Erarslan, A. (2016). Mimaride Anlam; Yapıdaki “Sembolik Dil” Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Tasarım+ Kuram, 10(18), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.23835/tasarimkuram.239593
Erdem Aksoy. (1975). Mimarlıkta Tasarım İletim Ve Denetim. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi.
Gazvoda, D. (2002). Characteristics of Modern Landscape Architecture and İts Education. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(2), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00064-6
Goldschmidt, G. (1997). Capturing In Determinism: Representation In The Design Problem Space. Design Studies, 18(4), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00011-2
Howard, T. J./Culley, Stephen. J./Dekoninck, Elies:(2008). Describing The Creative Design Process By The Integration Of Engineering Design And Cognitive Psychology Literature. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001
Mumcu, S., Düzenli, T., & Alpak, E. M. (2021). Peyzaj MimarlığI Tasarım StüDyosu Deneyimlerinin Yeni Tasarım Problemlerinde Kullanılması: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Örneği. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. 11(2), 260-279. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1048385
Roozenburg, N. F., & Eekels, J. (1995). Product Design: Fundamentals Methods. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799608910069
Özkan, D. G., Alpak, E. M., & Düzenli, T. (2016). Tasarım Eğitiminde Yaratıcılığın Geliştirilmesi: Peyzaj Mimarlığı Çevre Tasarımı Stüdyo Çalışması. Ijasos-International E-Journal of Advances İn Social Sciences, 2(4), 136-143. Available at: http://ijasos.ocerintjournals.org/en/download/article-file/232093
Bingöl, M. P. (2016). Temel Tasarim Eğitiminde Kavramdan Üç Boyuta Geçişe Yönelik Bir Uygulama Örneği. İdil Sanat Ve Dil Dergisi, 5(21), 339-362. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=694137
San, İ. (2003). Sanat Eğitimi Kuramları, Utopya Yayınevi.
Şentürer, A. (2004). Mimarlıkta Estetikte Tasarımda Eğitimde Eleştirel Yaklaşım. Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi. İStanbul : Yapı-EndüStri Merkezi.
Simon, H. A. (1988). The Science of Design: Creating The Artificial. Design Issues, 67-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511391
Visser, W. (1994). Organisation of Design Activities: Opportunistic, With Hierarchical Episodes. Interacting with Computers, 6(3), 239-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(94)90015-9
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Elif AYAN ÇEVEN